So the big tech is censoring people they dislike. Unfavorable speech is protected above all in terms of speech as no need to protect accepted speech. If they keep violating rights they need to be regulated. I can’t believe I just channeled Bernie.
In 2011, for example, the Court ruled 8–1 that members of Westboro Baptist Church, a tiny Kansas institution, had a First Amendment right to picket the funerals of American soldiers killed in action while displaying signs reading “Thank God for Dead Soldiers.” The church teaches that these deaths represent divine punishment for America’s tolerance of homosexuality and other matters. In his opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, “As a nation, we have chosen to protect even hurtful speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle public debate.”32
American Government: A Brief Introduction (Brief Fifteenth Edition)” by Theodore J. Lowi, Benjamin Ginsberg, Kenneth A. Shepsle, Stephen Ansolabehere.
Start reading it for free: http://a.co/05pJVrQ
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education is far better then ADL and other civil rights organizations that have fallen from grace.
So this is a violation of section 230 as theybare acting as a Publisher not Platform!
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act | Electronic Frontier Foundation
https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230
So the ADL releases a list, and big tech starts acting like their little attack dog, strange no reaction when a mass of attacks on orthodox jews in NY via Islamic followers?
The Anti-Defamation League Is Not What It Seems http://bostonreview.net/politics/emmaia-gelman-anti-defamation-league-not-what-it-seems#.Xk_qv5vOJ9s.twitter
Despite YouTube Policy Update, Anti-Semitic, White Supremacist Channels Remain | Anti-Defamation League
https://www.adl.org/blog/despite-youtube-policy-update-anti-semitic-white-supremacist-channels-remain
Funny the left is, my opinion let them air their speech and have others contest their statement, debunk their ideas, and contest their motives. In short, protect the unfavorable address that others seek to take away. I mean, the second is to protect the first right, not a gun owner, but others are, and they are getting tired. So you are not to be permitted your freedom of speech, but I can as a leftist and will demand you speak as I say and call me by my preferred pronouns and name you bigot! So how are we to take them seriously when they are the ones taking away other’s right to exist (Black, Gay, Latino, etc., etc. Conservatives/For Trump/WalkAway/Blexit) as any deviants are ostracized and canceled.
[The Red Elephants Vincent James] Another MASSIVE Channel Has Been DELETED by YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvojhnIKjeQ
Use Trans Pronouns Or Get Fired, Ohio Court Tells Christian Professor | The Daily Wire
https://www.dailywire.com/news/use-trans-pronouns-or-get-fired-ohio-court-tells-christian-professor?%3Futm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dwtwitter
[Timcast IRL] Preferred Pronoun Laws Are COMPELLED Speech, No One Can FORCE You To Say Anything you Don’t Want To
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR2oWAnbj14
#timcastIrl
#1A #FreedomOfSpeech #ADL #FIRE #theRedElephantsVincentJames #Censorship