#FreedomOfSpeech #UkraineRussiaWar #misinformation America is setting up the ministry of truth via DHS, Ukraine being the good guy arresting dissenting people “Give a good man firepower and he’ll never run out of people to kill!” And these are the “good guys” folks.
Why is it that when they cut military expenses, they replace that “cut” with more military spending, and yet you ask me why I hate the government? Once you blow out the budget, got to keep blowing out the budget even more like a nickel an hour fuck in an alley?
In regards to 20:28, the organization effect: It’s your new car until it’s your old car. It’s a crisis until it’s a part of everyday life. And that’s why I oppose ANY socialized expansion as it gets normalized. https://youtu.be/PoaGj54b6NY #Politics #News
In my previous post I went over the facts and information that was available at that time like and even the New York Times did proper reporting
“First shooting
While Mr. Rittenhouse is being pursued by the group, an unknown gunman fires into the air, though it’s unclear why. The weapon’s muzzle flash appears in footage filmed at the scene.
Mr. Rittenhouse turns toward the sound of gunfire as another pursuer lunges toward him from the same direction. Mr. Rittenhouse then fires four times and appears to shoot the man in the head.
Credit…By The New York Times. Image: Drew Hernandez, via Twitter
Second shooting
Mr. Rittenhouse seems to make a phone call and then flees the scene. Several people chase him, some shouting, “That’s the shooter!”
As Mr. Rittenhouse is running, he trips and falls to the ground. He fires four shots as three people rush toward him. One person appears to be hit in the chest and falls to the ground. Another, who is carrying a handgun, is hit in the arm and runs away.
Mr. Rittenhouse’s gunfire is mixed in with the sound of at least 16 other gunshots that ring out during this time.
CreditCredit…By The New York Times. Image: Brendan Gutenschwager, via Storyful”
Now since then discovery has happened and lawyers have been playing the game of Sophistry, and here is an old but good breakdown for that point of time of what was known or not know.
Both videos are from 2020 and present-day things like the prosecution is trying to get a list of all the donors that are funding the defense of Kyle Rittenhouse. How can this not result in a doxing event?
“Two far-right activists claim to have had their accounts with Wells Fargo closed as a result of their extremist political beliefs.
Lauren Witzke, who was the GOP nominee for U.S. Senate in Delaware in 2020, and Pete D’Abrosca, who attempted to run for office in 2020 in North Carolina but failed to submit the proper paperwork in time, both took to social media Tuesday to suggest that they had been “canceled” by the bank.
But a spokesperson for the bank said that their extremist political views had nothing to do with the closure of their accounts. “Wells Fargo does not consider political views or affiliations in making account decisions,” Wells Fargo spokesperson Beth Richek told Right Wing Watch via email Wednesday. She added …
Right Wing Watch asked what reasons the bank might have to close any account, but a spokesperson said the bank had nothing else to add on the matter. …”
Can you really see Antifa, Black Lives Matter getting violent and aiming to sway the trial to go the way they wish it would go? Trump and Lauren Witzke regardless of the politics were high status figures and like this teacher where Project Veritas targeted hm and right wing activist got him fired.
This teacher was of a left leaning the former two were right leaning and there are many more examples out there. Point is this cancel culture mob mentality is a two-way street.
The Proud Boys and Patriot Prayer could show up making Kyle Rittenhouse’s issues worse as the left-wing news and activist react accordingly. The Black Lives Matter could do as they did in many cities, Michael Tracey went to small town the mainstream press ignores and reported the terrorism that was done in the name of and by Black Lives Matter rioters and allies.
Or that the jury will not be swayed by the composition of the members as in Derrek Chauvin’s case. They rightly reached the proper conclusion, but the activism has politicized the case making it a left or right thing vs a justice or injustice thing.
Unlike Sean’s optimism I am betting on activism from both sides each rightly reacting to the actions of the other as this trial stems from the reaction to people reacting to the Black Lives Matter riots that were a reaction to Derek Chauvin’s actions leading to George Floyd’s death.
The Democrats claim they are above the Republicans
and vise versa; this is not true; look at the recent walkout of Democrats in
Texas restructuring their voting procedures that were by nature temporary and
not permanent as the Covid 19 pandemic raged across the nation. However, little
known fact is Republicans have done this as well in our nation’s history and as
the pandemic when voting on State Aide in the States Legislative
body.
Regardless of the act being the exact and done
multiple times by both parties united by partisan talking points, both Republicans
and Democrats see the walk outs differently, how can the same act be different
depending on who is doing all in favor of a talking point or political issues
from voting to budget or fiscal responsibility.
Bring the course of events to this pressure point in
which lacking reporting, no such actions were taken against the Republican walkouts.
However, such actions were taken against the Democrat politicians. The
leadership position is only that of the speaker, and the Democrats are still barring
legislative action by denying a quorum; threats of arrest and other legal
actions are the things that ignite people to the polls but never fix the
problems we need fixing.
#ShallNotBeInfringed #2A #News #Law This bill they say will create more crime. While letting probe of easy while they are a clear and present danger to society. 2021-2022 Bill 3094: Open Carry with Training Act – South Carolina Legislature Online https://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess124_2021-2022/bills/3094.htm
“Some Democrats said legalizing open carry would lead to more violence and death in the state, and they accused Republicans of voting for the bill to win political points with voters.”
“Democratic state Rep. Jermaine Johnson of Hopkins said open carry is a privilege for white people, but dangerous for a Black man like him — a former college basketball player who is 6-foot-7 (200 centimeters) and has tattoos.”
Thoughts outloud 